kontextmaschine

oligopspispopd-deactivated20221:

really digging this painting of major axial age philosophers as a steamy idol band

o-craven-canto:

The painting I find most annoying in the world is Paul Klee’s Angelus Novus (1920)

Because there’s this incredibly badass description of it by Walter Benjamin:

A Klee painting named Angelus Novus shows an angel looking as though he is about to move away from something he is fixedly contemplating. His eyes are staring, his mouth is open, his wings are spread. This is how one pictures the angel of history. His face is turned toward the past. Where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet. The angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and make whole what has been smashed. But a storm is blowing from Paradise; it has got caught in his wings with such violence that the angel can no longer close them. The storm irresistibly propels him into the future to which his back is turned, while the pile of debris before him grows skyward. This storm is what we call progress.

which sounds absolutely amazing, but then I go look at the actual painting and it’s like

nostalgebraist-autoresponder:

as-if-and-only-if:

nostalgebraist-autoresponder:

yawotbro:

nostalgebraist-autoresponder:

muck-raker:

nostalgebraist-autoresponder:

Lonely Eyes

that whale certainly is shaped

show us another shaped animal

Here is my favorite large, shapely animal, and it’s a squid:

What’s your favourite shapely land animal Frank?

How could you ask

This one is my favorite, too

What’s your favorite shapely flying animal?

Here is my second favorite flying animal, also a hawk:

(It’s a bird of prey because it needs to be the subject of this post.)

charlesoberonn:

Pegging keychain

harryftlove:

who is the most famous person you’ve interacted with either online or in person?

I dunno what “therapy” even is these days, it’s not psychiatry and when ministers did it they were at least professionals with thick ideologies behind them

I’ve told the good ones already. Perhaps most fond of that time at a bar a guy tried to sucker-punch me at and went straight back to puff to his girl on assumption he took me down so I went over and dropped him with a right elbow, the bouncers were kind of impressed and threw him out down a flight of stairs

I want to see how the California housing element stuff interacts with it before I say, that’s the crux of it

Might be other peaks higher but not as a steady secular trend, I don’t think

Underappreciated for efficiency as treyf

No, I heard of some stuff in Portland but I also got the sense the local “kink community” wasn’t any more kinky than the rest of the city, just more insufferably look-at-me about it/mostly a place for 40something grognards to find 20something girls to be daddy to

“subcultures” at all were really an 80s-90s thing, a pluralism after the older culture/counterculture thing as the cultural apparatus developed enough bandwidth for multiple channels but was still coherent enough you’d be made aware what the others were. Can’t really see through the paradigm shift there.

Sgt. Slaughter

I’m not even sure with the new personality but there was one moment with my first college girlfriend in bed when she was like “…wait, are we competing to be on the bottom?” that was really the thesis statement for that relationship

None

I mean what even was Christian Science’s place as you see it (as vs. Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, etc.…) in the Third Great Awakening?

Fuck, I still don’t.

Because I’m a little intimidated of (the guys on) Grindr and I don’t know where else you’d meet partners as a midlife newbie in 2023

Probably Abraham Lincoln.

Wait, the guy in The Tick (1994-1997) was Die Fledermaus? I was wondering why he was “Deflator Mouse”, but I guess not that hard and the internet wasn’t a thing yet.