I like how US Carrier Air Wings rn are like 50 Hornets stapled together, they were like “come on this is ridiculous these aren’t big enough for this” and the Navy just made Big Hornets for them
19th century autists codified vast systems of literature and culture in order to invent this thing called “nations” that we could then use to kill each other.
Fred T. Jane started publishing Jane’s Fighting Ships, a compendium of data on every warship in the world, in 1898 as a wargaming supplement.
It’s interesting to think about the (many) ways in which the modern “bay-area rationalist techno-libertarian” culture (i.e. Scott Alexander’s Grey Tribe, and to a lesser extent all of STEM academia) is effectively an outgrowth not of the bourgeoisie “entrepreneurial” class identified with the American upper-middle, but rather of the historical-and-present military officer class. Examples:
seeing things in terms of game-theory, negotiations, and logistics—in est, in terms of strategy;
breaking debates down into positive vs. normative subcomponents, and then setting out to solve the positive subcomponent; thus, technocratic politics;
the default assumption of meritocracy, and the belief (against evidence) that organizations with many members from this class will naturally end up meritocratic;
thinking in terms of capability rather than intent or policy, e.g. “the only thing stopping the state from seeing your data is encryption”, or “the only thing stopping nuclear war is MAD”;
the whole notion that while the world is suboptimal on a macro-political level, this is fixable through strength of arms: directly through war, or indirectly through technological innovation. Culture is the thing presumed to be immutable and worked around—an attitude foreign to most every other class, who think of culture as the first and only viable battleground for macro-political change;
an enjoyment of futurism (i.e. speculative fiction, X-risk debates) but also Futurism (the aesthetic of early speculative fiction, of games like Portal and Bioshock, of clean elegant spaceships and “fixed” transhuman genomes.) This is the only class that sees nothing wrong with the concept of a “supersoldier.” (It assumes the advances will turn the crank of genomics tech, which will result in the positive macro-political shifts mentioned above);
the ideal of Heinlein’s competent man, completely autonomous, able to restart civilization from its bootstraps—not quite a Nietzschean übermensch, since the philosophy and beliefs of the “competent man” are mostly irrelevant—it is instead the skill-set that matters, and its concentration all in one (or rather, every) individual;
the drawing of a sharp division between “officer-quality” and “enlisted-quality” people, where the distinction comes down not to acculturation into this officer class, but to potential: raw intelligence and willingness to learn, but not to labor (i.e. the ability to be the “competent man”, and then—having gained the knowledge to do so—the desire and analytical capacity to properly delegate to others who have a comparative advantage in those skills, rather than to do them oneself);
for the above reason reason, the highest likelihood of any class to hire skilled laborers and tradesmen or pay for services, instead of attempting to do “amateur” work themselves. The numerous profitable startups serving exclusively the “rich SV engineer who wants to automate something” crowd can attest to this. (Though, as above, this class first seeks to understand the work that will be done, such that they can then observe and evaluate the performance of the contractor or service. This leads to many a tradesman being “told how to do their job” by members of this class whenever they do something nonstandard);
the scouting for un-acculturated members, with an explicit path to acculturate them, vis. officer training schools, or coding bootcamps. This is one of the few classes (the only?) that almost universally encourages, and attempts to facilitate entry into it. This class doesn’t see people in the other classes as doing something inherently “bad” that must be corrected. Instead, it sees most people as being in their “proper” class, the one that fits them—but sees the “officer-quality” people who are in some other class as being in the “wrong” class, and assumes they will feel much better when “rescued” by this class. (Which is at least sometimes true; many who were bullied in a differently-classed public school do feel “rescued” when they enter a STEM program in university.)
Remember, Silicon Valley was a DARPA project center first, and the startups there are the diaspora. SV and Bay-area culture is military-officer culture.
If you identify strongly with characters like Miles Vorkosigan and Ender Wiggin, it might do to ask yourself how much of that is a feeling of identification with a member of a class you didn’t realize you were in.
a point to be made this isn’t an “officer class” derived from the old aristocracy and bent under Prussian influence
this is specifically a British colonial officer class
Something I think about sometimes is how in the 2000s when the services were in a tough recruitment fight the US Navy decided to improve its image by getting themselves some badass camo uniforms, only in like naval shades of blue, and ignored the precedent of other states using bright orange “tiger stripes” in their patterns and how it turns out the only thing those uniforms actually blended in to, it made it harder to spot sailors who’d fallen overboard
watching some Knight Rider on El Rey, it’s this weird Power Rangers dynamic where this goofy-ass overacting plot is melded with exciting (car chase) action footage from a completely unconnected filming unit
also like the Six-Million Dollar Man, all “Kids, you like the military, right? …oh, okay, you remember Vietnam, you hate the military.”
“Kids, you like one-off special function machines controlled with light-up buttons from your cockpit electronics warfare station?”
(Then came Top Gun, “but what if it was The Navy all along”)
