\n\n\nSo yesterday I remembered that Slate and Salon had been around for like twenty goddamn years, and I thought it would be funny to go back and check their early stuff and see how much had changed and how distant the past seemed
I settled on this issue of Slate, April 26, 1999 which of the earliest Wayback Machine archives was the first one to be something useful, sooo, let\u2019s take a look
First off, it leads with a bunch of features that are really just summaries and links to other publications or websites - I forgot before social media platforms and blogs, really, how much websites were just daily-updated lists pointing you to interesting things elsewhere. It\u2019s interesting that many of these summaries don\u2019t have any links, I\u2019m not clear whether that was because they were of dead-tree media that didn\u2019t have websites or because of journalistic etiquette policy.
I remember that back then old-line journalism was kind of daffy about the net, and I know some places at least frowned on linking to internal pages, because they wanted you to approach and navigate through the front page, paper-style. So as to prevent someone from undermining their advertising model and system of cross-promotion and cross-subsidy exactly like Facebook did maybe, so.
The big news of the day was NATO\u2019s war in Kosovo and the Columbine shooting, which had just recently occurred (and seemed to be shorthanded more as Littleton than Columbine at this point). So, what kind of OC do they have on the war?
Ah, hm. Masha Gessen kinda mawking us towards Eastern European war, William Saletan meandering in circles stroking his chin, Jonathan Chait (in an installation of regular feature \u201cCrapshoot\u201d, tagline \u201cDumb Ideas Exposed Here\u201d) dismisses the notion that soldiers are underpaid and in need of the raises they recently recieved
The 13 percent \u201cpay gap\u201d represents the difference in the growth of military versus civilian wages since 1982\u2013that is, civilian wages have grown 13 percent faster. This does not mean that soldiers earn less than civilians, because it does not take into account the pay differential from 1982. If my wages have increased by 100 percent during the past five years while Bill Gates\u2019 have increased by nearly 50 percent, this does not mean that I am earning 50 percent more than Bill Gates, since he was making more to begin with.
So, the more things change, I guess. What else, what else? Oh,\u00a0\u201cExplainer\u201d was them. That wasn\u2019t cited enough as a precedent to Vox, at least their early intentional style, the modest height they dived off to chase clicks
Looking around in other links there ARE some really striking bits in here though.
Students at Wofford College in Spartanburg, S.C., staged a protest March 3 against one of their fellow students, white supremacist Davis Wolfgang Hawke, a Web-savvy junior who runs a neo-Nazi organization from his dorm room.
man was just ahead of his time
A University of Arizona student who enrolled in a class called \u201cWomen in Literature\u201d was dismayed to discover that the class addressed gay and lesbian issues. As a result, the Arizona legislature is now considering warning labels for courses with potentially \u201cobjectionable\u201d content. Says Arizona Regents President Judy Gignac, \u201cThe students are our customers and they are paying to be taught. They need to know in advance what it is they\u2019re paying for.\u201d
ditto
Confronted by an increasingly vocal faction of rabbinical students and liberal rabbis, New York\u2019s Jewish Theological Seminary may be forced to reconsider its ban on admitting homosexual students.
That\u2019s Conservative Judiasm, if you were curious
The Matrix (Warner Bros.). Keanu Reeves stars in this complex, dystopic sci-fi thriller. Critics give high marks to the computer-enhanced special effects but are divided on the merits of the ambitious plot and the everything-but-the-kichen-sink filmic provenance, from Soylent Green to Terminator 2 to Hong Kong actioners. For some the effects are enough\u2026
nice
(To see the trailer and some fine Keanu pics, visit this fan site[)]
NICE
Entertainment Weekly\u2019s Owen Gleiberman writes [10 Things I Hate About You] \u201cmay be the cheekiest \u2018literary\u2019 update yet\u2013a post-riot grrrl gloss\u201d of the play. Many gush over the foxy young star, Julia Stiles. Complaints are mainly a result of critics\u2019 upscale-high-school-caper-film fatigue.
yeah, I guess those were two actual movie trends
A Walk on the Moon (Miramax Films). Mixed reviews, tending toward the negative, for this tale of sexual liberation set in 1969. A 32-year-old Jewish housewife who married too young is on vacation in the Catskills with her two kids and mother-in-law when she meets a sexy, young blouse peddler. The rest? As the Chicago Sun-Times\u2019 Roger Ebert says, it\u2019s \u201cone small step for the Blouse Man, a giant leap for Pearl Kantrowitz.\u201d
uh
Economist, May 1
(posted Friday, April 30, 1999)The cover story predicts that the disappearance of privacy will bring about \u201cone of the greatest social changes of modern times.\u201d Technology is destroying privacy that we took for granted 20 years ago, but the corresponding benefits\u2013better government services, cheaper products, less crime\u2013may outweigh that loss.
uh
New Republic, May 17
(posted Friday, April 30, 1999)
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The cover story describes the Palestinians\u2019 shriveling economy and corrupt political system\u2026 \u2026Holocaust scholar Daniel Jonah Goldhagen asserts that Serbia\u2019s crimes are \u201cdifferent from those of Nazi Germany only in scale.\u201d He also argues that an allied victory could stimulate a postwar democratic transformation of Yugoslavia similar to that of West Germany after World War II.\u2026
New York Times Magazine, May 2
(posted Thursday, April 29, 1999)
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The cover story contends that eliminating affirmative action does not devastate equal opportunity in higher education. \u00a0\u2026A Susan Sontag essay riffs on the Kosovo crisis, concluding that it is a just war to deter \u201cradical evil\u201d and that the allies will fail if they don\u2019t oust Milosevic.Time and Newsweek, May 3
(posted Tuesday, April 27, 1999)
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The newsweeklies reconstruct the Littleton massacre and solicit expert opinions on why it happened. Newsweek says that teen-agers kill when pre-existing biological flaws are exacerbated by poor nurturing. Biological warning signs: low heart rates and swollen brain lesions.haha wut
Newsweek reports that black athletes are shunning white agents for black ones. Among the black agents courting rookies are Puffy Combs, Master P, and Johnnie Cochran.
When Dan Quayle announced his presidential candidacy late last week, he also announced a theme. He would run against the \u201cdishonest decade\u201d of Clinton rule.
As someone who has been more or less overweight for most of my life, I\u2019ve noticed the increasing virulence with which TV and movies treat the issue of weight. It is rare, in fact, to see a portrayal of a fat person in which his weight is not the primary reason he is on screen. In the recent movie Office Space, for example, the heart-attack death of a fat marriage counselor is used as a pivotal plot point played for yuks\u2026
\u2026In a time when almost every deviation from the norm has been reclassified as a disability\u2013you can\u2019t even make fun of drug addicts any more\u2013fatness has become the new Polishness: an all-purpose locus of fun.
One person caught unawares by the popularity of armed guards in high schools was Charlton Heston. Heston, the NRA president, told reporters just after the shooting that the presence of \u201ceven one armed guard in the school\u201d could have averted tragedy. (For a Swiftian take on Heston\u2019s comments, click here.)
\u2026ah, I\u2019m gonna regret it, arent I
Shoot Hooligans, Not Hoops
Stop school violence: Arm school kids.By David Plotz
Posted Saturday, April 24, 1999, at 4:30 p.m. PTTHERE\u2019S the Slate I knew and loved
ABC\u2019s movie Swing Vote (Monday, April 19, 9 p.m.) plunges us immediately into a liberal\u2019s fever dream: Roe vs. Wade is ancient history, and a black Mississippi woman has been convicted of murdering her unborn baby.
In The Simpsons, a donut is not just a donut. It is a semiotically loaded piece of iconography nine years in the making: We have seen Homer steal the huge metal donut from the parking lot of Lard Lads Donuts to exact revenge for its \u201cfalse advertising\u201d (they wouldn\u2019t sell him a donut as big as the one outside). We have seen him pretend Grandpa Simpson was so senile he qualified for a helper monkey, which he then used to steal from donut shops. We know that at one point Homer actually sold his soul to the devil for a donut. In short, that small ring of frosted dough contains a universe of meaning for Simpsons viewers.
This detail goes a long way toward explaining the subdued critical response to the pilot of Matt Groening\u2019s new show Futurama, which aired last Sunday.
So, takeaway lessons?
First, yeah, I guess Slate really always was a liberal hawk rag, getting high on R2P.
Second those external links to essays from names you\u2019d still recognize on the necessity of war in Yugoslavia are fuuuuuuuucking bonkers though. I forgot how crazy the \u201890s were when we had no idea what to replace the Cold War with
\nThird I forgot how much they were still running a literary tone carried over from \u201csmall magazines\u201d - in the selection of culture topics and the general tone of writing
25 years ago!
"}