{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Not a lawyer, but iirc the American interpretation of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition, a contract is created by ~two elements: a...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/720245827003678720/", "html": "<div class=\"question\"><strong>open-road-air</strong> asked: <p>Not a lawyer, but iirc the American interpretation of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition, a contract is created by ~two elements: a \"meeting of the minds\" (i.e., mutual understanding about the terms of an agreement) and an \"exchange of valuable consideration\" (i.e., an agreement is only a contract if it involves swapping things of value). Some quick googling suggests that the stuff I've bundled under \"meeting\" might be disaggregated but w/e. Paper doesn't matter! Signatures don't count!</p></div>\n<p><a class=\"tumblr_blog\" href=\"https://argumate.tumblr.com/post/720236719698591744/not-a-lawyer-but-iirc-the-american-interpretation\">argumate</a>:</p>\n\n<blockquote><p>right, if paper and signatures were vital to the magic ritual then we wouldn&rsquo;t be able to use apps for stuff</p></blockquote><p><p>This is why bullshit unilateral &ldquo;we agree to do this&rdquo; contracts and deals will formally be in exchange for $1, to make them legally valid and binding. Scots law, at least, recognizes binding unilateral &ldquo;promises&rdquo; without this requirement, I was looking forward to seeing that come up somehow if Scotland became independent.</p></p>"}