{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "According to Yossef Rapoport, in the 15th century, the rate of divorce was higher than it is today in the modern Middle East,...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/703513642926260224/", "html": "<p><a class=\"tumblr_blog\" href=\"https://max1461.tumblr.com/post/703512824827330560/i-suspect-that-in-many-societies-marriage\" target=\"_blank\">max1461</a>:</p><blockquote><p><a class=\"tumblr_blog\" href=\"https://memecucker.tumblr.com/post/703493667430776832/according-to-yossef-rapoport-in-the-15th-century\" target=\"_blank\">memecucker</a>:</p><blockquote><blockquote class=\"npf_indented\"><p>According to Yossef Rapoport, in the 15th century, the rate of divorce was higher than it is today in the modern Middle East, which has generally low rates of divorce.[42] In 15th century Egypt, Al-Sakhawi recorded the marital history of 500 women, the largest sample on marriage in the Middle Ages, and found that at least a third of all women in the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and Syria married more than once, with many marrying three or more times. According to Al-Sakhawi, as many as three out of ten marriages in 15th century Cairo ended in divorce.[43]</p></blockquote><p><br/></p><blockquote class=\"npf_indented\"><p>In the early 20th century, some villages in western Java and the Malay peninsula had divorce rates as high as 70%.[42]</p></blockquote><p>This is pretty interesting if you\u2019re used to a Western perspective where higher divorce rates and lower stigmatization of divorce is seen as a progressively \u201cmodern\u201d thing. I wanna check out the cited sources bc I hope they get into some details about these divorces and if there\u2019s information about social class, stated reasons and which spouse tended to initiate the divorce etc</p></blockquote><p>I suspect that in many societies, &ldquo;marriage&rdquo; is/was basically the equivalent of what we would today call &ldquo;serious dating&rdquo; or what have you; it was certainly less bureaucratized at basically every point in history than it is today. In light of this, &ldquo;divorce&rdquo; might have been more akin to just&hellip; breaking up. Divorce as we know it today, the convoluted legal process, may be the exception rather than the rule.</p></blockquote>\n<p>This inspires me to again note that what we know as &ldquo;dating&rdquo; was basically what the mid-20th century would know as &ldquo;going steady&rdquo;, and what they would have known as &ldquo;dating&rdquo; is probably closest to our &ldquo;hooking up&rdquo;</p>"}