{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Hey, today I learned that my catalogued lack of dating experience is cited in an academic paper", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/699681777871192064/", "html": "
Jokes aside, this quote is how the researchers kick off an exploration of the under-researched concept of \u201cfriends to partners\u201d with a call to social researchers to reframe their (apparently exclusive) focus on \u201cdating\u201d as the sole initiating event of romantic relationships. It\u2019s actually a very interesting paper; apparently social scientists and pop culture focus their attention on the process of \u201cdating\u201d, a frankly heteronormative lens that insists on very specific behaviours and scenarios, in which single people market themselves to each other at bars. Meanwhile, in the actual people surveyed in the study, it appears far more common for people to prefer \u201cfriends to lovers\u201d as a relationship pathway.
\u201cOur research reveals that relationship initiation studies published in popular journals (Study 1) and cited in popular textbooks (Study 2) overwhelmingly focus on romance that sparks between strangers and largely overlook romance that develops between friends. This limited focus might be justified if friends-first initiation was rare or undesirable, but our research reveals the opposite. In a meta-analysis of seven samples of university students and crowdsourced adults (Study 3; N = 1,897), two thirds reported friends-first initiation, and friends-first initiation was the preferred method of initiation among university students (Study 4). These studies affirm that friends-first initiation is a prevalent and preferred method of romantic relationship initiation that has been overlooked by relationship science. We discuss possible reasons for this oversight and consider the implications for dominant theories of relationship initiation.\u201d
Like holy cow did you guys KNOW that relationship science was dominated by studies on dating? A thing that in which good grades are not possible to achieve?
And it\u2019s kind of good for ME to hear as well! As a (weird queer) person, dating always seemed so artificial and undesirable to me, but so important to everyone else, that it was clearly just One Of Those Things that is programmed into the Normal Hetero Brain that folks like me simply miss out on, forever. But possibly not! Possibly \u201cdating\u201d is one of those heavily marketed products that nobody particularly wants. Like the Metaverse. And nobody, until these plucky social scientists, has been brave enough to call it out!!
But yes. At the expense of elodie glass\u2019s dating history being notably sparse (Stinson, 2021).
![](\"/media/7ae8fa8806ef9cf2f3d60ef5f21617aa90e01dfc_fb21354e2d52.png\")