{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "The internet is amazing for sociological research in that it is the ultimate double-edged sword. All self-writings are...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/699401660715384832/", "html": "

youzicha:

\n\n

centrally-unplanned:

centrally-unplanned:

The internet is amazing for sociological research in that it is the ultimate double-edged sword. All self-writings are performative to some degree, in fact things like historical \u2018journals\u2019 were often literary fads or writing projects that would envision public release. But still, in comparison the internet is an absolute explosion of written, documented text (& images and film!) about what people care about, spend their time on, etc, but all of it has been ruthlessly pruned by optimization metrics to be content to be consumed by others. Its all half real, half brand.

I will often, to study how people view a media property, watch all the different youtube videos or read the reddit posts on it, but (particularly with the youtube) you can\u2019t actually take naively that the opinion being stated is the creator\u2019s opinion; instead its the narrative they would be interesting to make as a video. They probably believe that narrative after making the video, that work changes you, but that chronology matters, and you can only view that process from the edges of those polished works.

\n

So someone linked an upload of some really early anime websites that got loaded on CDs\u2026 from a\u00a0magazine? That would include as a bonus to subscribers?? Archived versions of fansites on the CDs??? Which is just, amazing on so many levels, but is a real bonus for us. One of the linked early fan sites is Fredart.com, Megatokyo author Fred Gallagher\u2019s pre-webcomic site on anime news and his personal art. (Really having a lot of Megatokyo Baader-Meinhoff these days)

First off it\u2019s adorable, the art in particular is great and it has all of these details on like forum website drama at the time, precious info. Check it out if you want.

What draws my eye most is something it shares with its contemporary peers, the utter *lack* of optimization its text has gone through to engage its audience. Everything is just filled with asides, personal details, life stories; now you know this fan-art outfit was inspired by shopping with Fred\u2019s then-girlfriend Sarah at the mall, on Saturday, at Hudsons!

Or how Sarah\u2019s Origami page tells us she picked it up as a seduction technique to get into weeb-master Fred\u2019s good graces on its literal intro, which is the cutest and she should be immensely proud of this even 24 years later, I hope she is:

No one (on average ofc ofc exceptions exist) does this posting fan art these days, you add like a quippy one-liner or a tag & title, because people want the art, you have optimized the content for that. Its not like Fred & others weren\u2019t trying to make their website entertaining, though; they just didn\u2019t get feedback on how, there were no engagements and very few metrics.\u00a0\u201cTalking normal about themselves\u201d was as good a way as any. So you get very high levels of just authentic, actual real-life information. I know more about Fred in 1998, how he actually lived, from this website than I do from 99% of the people I follow on Tumblr (or worse, Twitter).

Though I think there is an added factor to this one - in 1998 on the internet you would expect people to care about this more. The reason fan artist #8367 phrases every non-art tweet as a joke or politics rant is because they know you won\u2019t care otherwise, you have ten thousand fan artists to choose from so you gotta make it interesting (note, if you are thinking of counterexamples: are they hot?). You only matter for your content; existing is useless. But on the early internet, running a website? You were important *by default*. You got points just for showing up. Numbers were low, content was sparse, finding peers was take-what-you-can get. As such, you did care about the person, inherently, as they were there, and that makes them worth caring about. Its like default celebrity status. Visiting these websites - personally made by small groups - was like a digital housecall. People very quickly became no-qualifiers-needed-friends in that environment.

Now that you pick and choose from a list of hundreds of thousands, we have all been trained to look for different things. Which means we write different things to match. How we communicate has been transformed by our digital architecture (Other factors at play of course, generational conditioning, social media site design, etc; one at a time\u2026)

Oh and here is Ruri in a Summer Dress, in case you were curious; the jacket is great, love the curved hem and the piping.

\n

Huh, that really is very different from the modern web. My first impression was\u00a0\u201cteenager\u201d (when we also tend to experiment with different forms of social presentation and see what works), but Gallagher was 30 when he wrote it.

", "thumbnail_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/media/eeed3967d56896439b8c32885a459102af6013dc_32b63f525e93.png", "thumbnail_width": 540, "thumbnail_height": 460}