\nThey say proselytism is basically a numbers game with converts a function of how much effort you put into missionary work, mediated by the chance the target is open to a new path (which goes up in cases of crisis and tragedy) and the wealth difference of the mission/convert (which affects the secular appeal of community membership). Mormons and Scientologists get so many converts because they deploy existing members to spend a lot of time seeking them.
Which makes me wonder how useful Chick Tracts could’ve been in evangelism \u2013 even if the recipient is in an vulnerable state, how likely is it that the specific subject of the tract at all corresponds?
Strikes me that distributing them was more for the benefit of the distributor, who got to have the experience of affirming whatever specific position to an audience.
@space-wizards said: “chick tracts were an exercise in evangelical autofellatio” is not exactly an earth shattering insight
“What that you know of today similarly presents as outward-directed recruitment but actually functions on inward-directed lines?” is a good prompt, though.
"}