{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Not sure \"let's force Russia into autarky with no resources but a massive supply of hydrocarbons they can't export and will be...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/678188581376950272/", "html": "

kontextmaschine:

kontextmaschine:

kontextmaschine:

kontextmaschine:

kontextmaschine:

Not sure “let’s force Russia into autarky with no resources but a massive supply of hydrocarbons they can’t export and will be replaced on world markets by American production” is gonna be a winning decarbonization strategy, honestly

Oh, especially in the middle of the whole “electricity can be frictionlessly converted to ungovernable mediums of exchange” crypto thing

Of course, the country composed substantially of undeveloped land in Siberia might well be less committed to carbon reduction as a state imperative

And to the extent you do form a broad global front that leaves Russia isolated, that means that every negative impact of warming in various more temperate countries is something that causes suffering and issues in your coalition, which will in turn have more leverage to apply against your energy sector

Conservative neo-isolationism is already more of a thing, and the Deep State, contra the R2P types, flexed its “don’t face off against Russian troops, idiot” instincts in Syria, how well can you imagine “Sanctions aren’t enough! We need to go to hot land war in Asia against Russia to stop global warming!” going down?

\n

\u2026"against the declared global protector of Christendom in the name of a world that affirms your children’s gender fluidity"

"}