{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Ran into a paywall on Slate, don't remember that before. Been seeing talk around over Slate as it tries to figure out what it's...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/676477808837558272/", "html": "<p>Ran into a paywall on Slate, don&rsquo;t remember that before. Been seeing <a href=\"https://href.li/?https://www.slowboring.com/p/slatepitch?utm_source=url\" target=\"_blank\">talk around</a> over Slate as it tries to <a href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/11/business/media/slate-departures.html\" target=\"_blank\">figure out what it&rsquo;s doing in the current media environment</a>.</p><p>I remember Slate before it was even known for &ldquo;slatepitches&rdquo;, it was just like one of two publications made for the Internet. Salon had the Cond\u00e9 Nast lush, well-paid name writer pieces. Slate, which was\ufffc\ufffc actually part of a Microsoft venture into media team-ups (that&rsquo;s also what the MS in MSNBC was) was thinner, a major feature was &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s Papers&rdquo; where someone just read The NY Times, WaPo, WSJ, USA Today, etc and summarized what was interesting in them. Sometimes this would be where you found links\ufffc, before the Twitter/Facebook timeline (or even the Reddit/Digg front page). Sometimes the stories weren&rsquo;t even available online yet.</p><p>Salon seemed to run out of money and implode in the early 2000s. They started a subscription program. I did, but unlike the (surely pricey) quality stuff before it was Bush Derangement Syndrome stuff they could get nobodies to turn out by the bucketload, I think some of the remaining original quality decanted to Slate.</p>"}