{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "2003 called, it wants its edgy new atheism back", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/676163125462138880/", "html": "<div class=\"question\"><strong>Anonymous</strong> asked: <p>2003 called, it wants its edgy new atheism back</p></div>\n<p><a class=\"tumblr_blog\" href=\"https://memecucker.tumblr.com/post/676091341379452928/2003-called-it-wants-its-edgy-new-atheism-back\" target=\"_blank\">memecucker</a>:</p><blockquote><p><a class=\"tumblr_blog\" href=\"https://hierarchyproblem.tumblr.com/post/676004332975620096/2003-called-it-wants-its-edgy-new-atheism-back\" target=\"_blank\">hierarchyproblem</a>:</p><blockquote><p><a class=\"tumblr_blog\" href=\"https://afloweroutofstone.tumblr.com/post/676003825830838272/2003-called-it-wants-its-edgy-new-atheism-back\">afloweroutofstone</a>:</p>\n\n<blockquote><p>The fact that any and all criticism of Christian theology on here is met with this response is how you know that the average person on Tumblr hasn\u2019t thought much about religion outside of the context of a Reddit argument</p></blockquote><p>If one&rsquo;s &ldquo;defence&rdquo; of Christian theology is to reflexively accuse one&rsquo;s opponents of being neckbeard fedoras or whatever, that shows frankly <i>less</i> engagement with the topic than that of the critic, who at least appears to consider it worth making actual arguments against! </p></blockquote><p>2022 called and it\u2019s badly in short supply of edgy atheist takes</p></blockquote>"}