{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "at this point talking about political or artistic movements as \u201cneo-\u201d whatever feels dumb, and it\u2019s not really future-proofed...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/668711835304869888/", "html": "

centrally-unplanned:

\n\n

discoursedrome:

at this point talking about political or artistic movements as \u201cneo-\u201d whatever feels dumb, and it\u2019s not really future-proofed since you end up with repeated waves of things and only one can really be new, so I think for any such movement that started between like 1990 and today, we should just use \u201ccyber-\u201d instead, like cyber-reactionaries, cyber-pronouns, etc. Everything is online and has a technological aspect nowadays so it counts I think

\n

Yet sex skipped right over its neo- phase and went straight to cybersex. When will our neosex era finally dawn?

\n\n\n

I use the Super/Ultra/Hyper hierarchy from the NES cyborg combat baseball game Base Wars

"}