{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "What just happened with single-family zoning in California?", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/662644244459175936/", "html": "<a href=\"https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2021-09-17/what-just-happened-with-single-family-zoning-in-california\">What just happened with single-family zoning in California?</a>\n<p><a href=\"https://collapsedsquid.tumblr.com/post/662624311447896065/what-just-happened-with-single-family-zoning-in\" class=\"tumblr_blog\" target=\"_blank\">collapsedsquid</a>:</p>\n\n<blockquote><blockquote><p>\nSB 9 has numerous exceptions and limitations, though, that are designed \nto preserve rental and low-income housing, deter speculators, guard \nagainst displacement and retain local governments\u2019 control over design \nstandards while also preventing local officials from adopting rules that\n undermine the law. These include: <br/></p><p><br/></p>Anyone applying to subdivide a lot must commit to living in one of the units there for at least three years.</blockquote><p>That seems like such a weird requirement and I\u2019m not sure what it\u2019s supposed to do<br/></p></blockquote>\n\n\n<p>The idea is make &ldquo;homeowner with a yard big enough to put another house on does so&rdquo; possible but not &ldquo;capital seeking return flows into real estate operations that actively seek out and acquire lots that meet minimum requirements for subdivision because they&rsquo;re valuing them on the basis of selling 2, thus extracting a huge profit by systematically maximizing the built density of all California residential neighborhoods&rdquo;</p>"}