Appreciate how 4chan is like a think tank of '90s culture, proffering their own approaches to the sexual issues of the...
Appreciate how 4chan is like a think tank of ‘90s culture, proffering their own approaches to the sexual issues of the zeitgeist
Like before “trans girls” got big in the 2010s they had “traps”. Who fulfilled the female criteria of being hot and consumable. “Traps aren’t gay” (to be attracted to as a man) was, after all, a claim that these chicks-with-docks were not, in fact, men.
And what is all the femdom (incl. monster girls) but a response to the complaint that men are personally predatory to women and use them for sex in the workplace not by attempting to suppress this but by spinning up cultural valences, idioms, and norm for women to be too?
Can anyone really manufacture sexual desires as a response to something? Surely it’s more that such people go where the stereotypes about predatory masculine sexuality do not?
LGBT subculture didn’t develop as a response to societally enforced heterosexual norms, it developed because LGBT people were already there in spite of those norms and needed a place to express their sexuality where people from society at large wouldn’t judge them.
In the 19th century handkerchief fetishes were a thing, now they’re not. I have to believe that’s because handkerchieves were a thing then. They’re similarly trying to make these things now.
I’ve seen a few girls in r/gonewildaudio, which is basically amateur radio drama sexual fantasies for you to masturbate to, going to “slime girl” and succubus idioms. Which like, it’s not cause they think guys are going to like slime girl transparency in audio, it’s because slime girls are a thing in their head now. Presumably then, so to a degree is “businessgyaru who uses the new guy”