{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "California politics make most sense when you understand the state understands itself as the shining future as seen from...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/637508820959215617/", "html": "<p>California politics make most sense when you understand the state understands itself as the shining future as seen from 1974</p><p>Xavier Becerra at HHS, like Hilda Solis at Labor before him, is about installing a good state party machine loyalist atop one of the most machine-potential departments and is mostly significant for how it affects <i>California</i> politics \u2013   as he was state AG this opens up a new statewide office for climbers.</p><p>With a huge population, a term\ufffc\ufffc-limited state legislature, only two senators, one set of constitutional offices, and waiting lists for every federal district, the musical-chairs aspect of just providing enough places for ambitious pols to <i>go</i> is getting to be an important way the national Dems service the state party.</p><p>In theory, the California Dems should be the party of everybody. And, they are, that&rsquo;s kind of the issue, they&rsquo;re the party of Scott Weiner and of everyone who hates Scott Weiner. Keeping promises to retirees that they can always live like it&rsquo;s 1966, established yuppies that they can always live like it&rsquo;s 1978, immigrants that they can always live like it&rsquo;s 1995 (Texas took over the promise that the white get-er-done class could always live like it was 1984)</p><p>Meanwhile no one really wants to live in 2020, but addressing that threatens to upset the state Dems in a way that the national party sees no advantage in over a stable one-party state</p>"}