Is a humanism that values life because of the *potential* of each person to engage in existential struggle meaningfully distinct...
Anonymous asked:
Is a humanism that values life because of the *potential* of each person to engage in existential struggle meaningfully distinct in practice from the liberal version? Or do I misunderstand whst you mean by existential conflict.
Well “you can’t have this existential conflict! we’ve got to eternally maximize for the possibility of never-to-be-realized existential conflict!” is dumb