{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "I don't think it's true that sexual media necessarily has an impregnation focus, at least not in a way that says generalizable...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/620498517194047488/", "html": "<div class=\"question\"><strong>Anonymous</strong> asked: <p>I don't think it's true that sexual media necessarily has an impregnation focus, at least not in a way that says generalizable things about the people who consume it. For example, I'm a cis bi woman who likes a/b/o, and for me the breeding part is entirely incidental. I seek it out and enjoy it because it hits my aphrodisiac and submission kink buttons.</p></div>\n<blockquote class=\"npf_indented\"><p>(Afterthought to last anon about sexual media  and a/b/o) I think in particular I enjoy submission that&rsquo;s written to  feel total, automatic, right, and instinctively satisfying. I often find  that the way a/b/o fic describes heat-induced submissiveness  (obedience, trust, desire to be claimed/owned, desire to be taken care  of) is a lot closer to the way I experience subspace than descriptions  of subspace in non-AU d/s writing are. I eroticize submission and like  sexual media that do that well.</p></blockquote><p>Like, \u201cmy natural submissiveness <i>just feels right</i> in the context of the body\u2019s hormonal drives to get bred\u201d isn\u2019t &ldquo;entirely incidental\u201d imo</p>"}