{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "personally i haven't noticed the difference in your personality and wouldn't have any more sex with you than i previously would...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/620497851819163648/", "html": "<div class=\"question\"><strong>Anonymous</strong> asked: <p>personally i haven't noticed the difference in your personality and wouldn't have any more sex with you than i previously would have. maybe your mutuals are just simps</p></div>\n<p>Oh! You have even lower charisma than my old personality! That makes so much sense - the way you\u2019re interested in Great History and not erotic personality, your grouchyness, the way you use words to get what you want, your not picking up tone.</p><p>I\u2019m starting to think what the sociability is, the INT/CHA distinction is where the old personality felt pressured to use language to assemble facts to be more correct, this more charismatic one is more tilted to read people\u2019s emotions and say things that move them towards me.</p><p>All my training and experience is still old way though, and as I\u2019ve exhibited I\u2019m good enough with words I can semantically overload them to the point where they have multiple \u201ctracks\u201d of meaning. Mostly I do it to be witty or draw attention to irony while being factually correct, but I think now I\u2019m using that capacity for the \u201cemotional\u201d track.</p><p>And the ability to do that while still being in reality is what does it. Just the Charisma version of speech and you get the slick-talking liar or some motherly treacle mob, just the Intelligence version and you get you.</p>"}