{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "So with people going off on JK Rowling asserting menstruation as a defining concept of womanhood as trans-exclusive, that makes...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/620491456592936960/", "html": "

So with people going off on JK Rowling asserting menstruation as a defining concept of womanhood as trans-exclusive, that makes me think

So much of the new woman\u2019s fantasy-driven \u201csexual media\u201d thing (an inheritance of what used to be borne by romance novels) at its core is about eroticizing penises ejaculating inside women\u2019s vaginas in a way that at least has the potential to get them pregnant

And impregnation isn\u2019t just hetero-marked, part of the reenchantment of heterosexuality, not just cis-marked like menstruation, but hetero-double-cis marked, on the impregnating and impregnated sides

So thats something to think about: out of public view, orgasm by orgasm we\u2019re reencoding sex fundamentally defined as cis-hetero

Theres workarounds - omegaverse stuff is basically transposing impregnation onto men to power M/M dynamics (kinda like how squirting helps men port over their understanding and kinks about their own ejaculation - \u201cblowing a big load\u201d as virile triumph, the idea that their satisfaction necessarily involves soiling something else…), you see it show up in ftm \u201cfuck my pussy like a girl\u201d stuff that eroticizes dysphoria. I havent seen any transbian variants, but maybe I\u2019m not reading the right futa.

"}