{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Okay I kind of pffed off all those headlines last month about Wikipedia editors being heavily male, but now a problem: the...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/4354218489/", "html": "<p>Okay I kind of pffed off all those headlines last month about Wikipedia editors being heavily male, but now a problem: the <a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chippendales\" target=\"_blank\">Chippendales page</a> is woefully, <em>woefully</em> short. As in, I&rsquo;d actually like to know something about them, and reading that I know nothing about them. <em>It does not even mention the tuxedo collar thing.</em> Compare to the page for <a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playboy_Bunny\" target=\"_blank\">Playboy Bunnies</a>, who predeceased them in both reality and cultural presence.</p>"}