{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "what's the difference between the two types of officer classes? social mobility?", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/188620751983/", "html": "<div class=\"question\"><strong>Anonymous</strong> asked: <p>what's the difference between the two types of officer classes? social mobility?</p></div>\n<p>re: <a href=\"/post/188589362022/\" target=\"_blank\">saying the &ldquo;STEM class&rdquo; as officer class</a> works better as colonial officers than as an army officer class that&rsquo;s a residue of aristocracy</p><p>Well I think some of the given characteristics match better.</p><p>Like, the developmentalist mindset, the taking &ldquo;culture&rdquo; as an arbitrary pre-set <i>given</i> to be worked around with the movable levers being force and technology and economics.</p><p>The &ldquo;competent man&rdquo; idea, able to manage any aspect of a modern society and to build it up from scratch. (Consider Robinson Crusoe as colonial ideal. Consider also Orwell&rsquo;s &ldquo;Shooting an Elephant&rdquo;, that if you put clever administrator-riflemen boys as the agents of your civilization, then they will use those skills to address in your name the issues faced, but to pose this as a Whiggish perfection of society is somewhat absurd.)</p>"}