{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "you can build a company on the concept \u201cwe make the best damn planes\u201d but you can\u2019t build a company on \u201cwe get the highest...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/187938281503/", "html": "<p><a class=\"tumblr_blog\" href=\"https://argumate.tumblr.com/post/187938108044/you-can-build-a-company-on-the-concept-we-make\" target=\"_blank\">argumate</a>:</p><blockquote><p>you can build a company on the concept \u201cwe make the best damn planes\u201d but you can\u2019t build a company on \u201cwe get the highest return on net assets\u201d.</p></blockquote>\n<p>Yeah, but as the 80s establish, if you put your hobby concept ahead of capital&rsquo;s imperative to get the highest return on net assets, someone who won&rsquo;t can make a profit by buying you out; on the other hand if you don&rsquo;t raise funds by issuing equity you&rsquo;ll get <i>outgrown, </i>and even then you have to outrace the cost of servicing your debt, which tracks with the returns capital as a whole is getting on its assets, weighted against the likelihood you&rsquo;ll survive and not, say, get outgrown.</p><p>Now you can regulate this if any given regulatory authority corresponds to a sufficient share of the corresponding economy; where authority is national but the economy is international that&rsquo;ll fail unless without tariffs and trade barriers; the more tariffs and trade barriers are actual obstacles to capital the further you move from the ideal postwar order of peaceful free trade and back to competing national-economic systems that tend to go to war for resources and captive markets.</p>"}