{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "thoughts on marianne williamson?", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/186673401398/", "html": "<div class=\"question\"><strong>Anonymous</strong> asked: thoughts on marianne williamson?</div>\n<p>When I say &ldquo;notice how 90s issues we thought settled or even tabooed are suddenly live again&rdquo;, tonight&rsquo;s breakout US Presidential candidate is antidepressant-critical</p><p>That said. There&rsquo;s total context collapse now, human followings are transferable from mass-appeal field to field: performing, acting, celebrity, spirituality, politics (which is why I have an eye on Taylor Swift).</p><p>And I said the 90s were back, and noticed women were witchy and zodiacal again, and how we were all post-rationalist and playing with Jewish and Christian myth now\u2026</p><p>Of <b>course</b> this neomystic wave was going to hit politics eventually, but I wasn&rsquo;t even thinking of that.</p><p>Maybe because I coded it, at least in her form as female and dismissible? Hm. I hear there are woman pastors and bloggers birthing paganisms out of the rotting shell of American Christianity recently, maybe I should pay that more attention. I bet Sister Aimee would have a shot today.</p><p>I don&rsquo;t think she&rsquo;s a threat to win it though, she&rsquo;s got a bold new style and positioning but it doesn&rsquo;t really align along obvious cleavages like how Trump offered a party realignment. If Ben Carson had had her talent, eventually the question would still have come up &ldquo;what are we supposed to be getting out of this?&rdquo;</p>"}