{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "What's going on in Oregon?", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/185984707643/", "html": "<div class=\"question\"><strong>Anonymous</strong> asked: <p>What's going on in Oregon?</p></div>\n<p>&ldquo;Traditional&rdquo; Oregon is pretty rural and as things have aligned nationally &ldquo;red&rdquo;. It&rsquo;s seen itself as a sort of free soil-free labor utopia and been wary of outsiders wrecking it, which since the 70s has mostly been <a href=\"https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CXk1882z5oo\" target=\"_blank\">aimed towards California</a>, and a fear that Oregon would follow its path, by giving up country virtue for city flash.</p><p>Oregon has a lot of internal cohesion though, so after the decline of the lumber industry (which was read by &ldquo;Red&rdquo; Oregon as engineered by extralocal big gubmint under the influence of urbanites alienated from rural life) and through the rise of &ldquo;Portlandia&rdquo; care was taken to preserve the interests of rural Oregon</p><p>As &ldquo;red&rdquo; and &ldquo;blue&rdquo; became more all-encompassing in the late 2000s with rural sorted to red, there was a narrow D majority but a spirit of bipartisanship and cross-cutting loyalties remained; when a gun control bill looked to pass on a party-line vote a D from eastern Oregon defected, and so on. Revenue bills further required a 3/5 supermajority.</p><p>But that&rsquo;s worn off as things progress. In 2018 the Dems <a href=\"https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2018/11/democrats_face_hurdles_in_oreg.html\" target=\"_blank\">got that supermajority</a>, (people noting already that quorum monkeying was an option) and <a href=\"https://www.wweek.com/news/state/2019/06/26/how-peter-courtney-lost-control-of-the-oregon-senate/\" target=\"_blank\">forces internal to the legislature</a> have undermined bipartisanship.</p><p>Now, Oregon only recently (2012) and partially moved away from an every-other-year &ldquo;citizen assembly&rdquo;. Features of this system are 1) that legislators tend to be local big wheels with extensive ties and ongoing business in their districts and 2) a vs.-the-clock setup where legislative tactics focus on delay past the end of session, when all unpassed bills are killed.</p><p>There was already a walkout earlier this year over gun control and something else that the Dems folded to but what made this one more critical is (like I keep saying of Wendy Davis&rsquo; 2013 &ldquo;pink shoes&rdquo; Texas filibuster) that it ate up time close to end of session and if upheld a few more days would have killed lots of critical bills like the one just passed to end urban single-family zoning statewide.</p><p>The &ldquo;militia&rdquo; thing was a sideshow to all that, but like the legislator in question <b>is</b> in fact a rural baron operating a private network of military logistics and special forces trainers in a hinterpand filled with disillusioned veterans! All those cute Cascadian and State of Jefferson flags <b>do</b> mean there is a strong sense of local particularism that takes the idiom of secessionist movements! In the form of those &ldquo;Patriot Prayer&rdquo; marches, Red Cascadia <b>has</b> been sending warriors on raids into Blue Portland!</p><p>On my trip I got a real Red Vienna/Black Austria sense, that they saw the Portland metro swollen with non-Oregonians arrogantly telling Oregon what to do, and were proud of their legislators, glad that <i>someone</i> was finally doing something about it. That&rsquo;s a real thing.</p>"}