{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "The logic behind Beto \u2014 I hear people like \u201cwhy did Beto almost win and that makes him Presidential timber but Stacey Abrams...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/183440965388/", "html": "<p>The logic behind Beto \u2014</p><p>I hear people like \u201cwhy did Beto almost win and that makes him Presidential timber but Stacey Abrams almost won and nothing\u201d</p><p>Well they had two close but related strategies for putting new energies in establishment harness: she maxed black enthusiasm while trusting a white liberal base to go along and almost won in Georgia, the best state for the strategy; he aimed to peel the alienated college-class suburbs while maintaining a solid base in traditional D environments and almost made it in Texas, possibly the most challenging state for <i>that</i> strategy</p><p>His primary gambit has to be to follow in Biden\u2019s shadow and be the answer to every \u201cI wish Joe but young/without the baggage/better with the modern base\u201d, the next generation Bill Clinton</p><p>(But missing the part where Clinton had party machine control and even extraparty-  Not only was Bill denouncing Sister Soulja but in the background other elements of the Clinton machine \u2013 Hillary and the Neera Tanden-equivalents esp. \u2013 were tamping down third-party radicalism by making sure any organization that tolerated it was cut off from the Dems\u2019 donor base)</p>"}