{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "One thing I don\u2019t understand at all \u2013 in accounts of early and mid-20th century America you see life insurance policies treated...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/183391537863/", "html": "<p>One thing I don\u2019t understand at all \u2013 in accounts of early and mid-20th century America you see life insurance policies treated how homeownership-by-mortgage is now: as an investment you gradually build equity in and can later partially or fully \u201ccash out\u201d as a nest egg.</p><p>And I kinda get it - an active policy is like a bond of unknown (but actuarially predictable) maturity and negative coupon rate (the premiums), I can see why that would be a negotiable instrument and tax/regulatory policy might\u2019ve favored that vehicle over other types of savings</p><p>But when doomed-seeming AIDS patients were pre-selling their insurance payouts in the 80s it was something distinct, \u201cviaticals\u201d, so how did the prior system work?</p>"}