{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Map showing the African American population distribution in the United States, 1900.  Keep reading", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/165058213333/", "html": "<p><a href=\"http://mapsontheweb.zoom-maps.com/post/165048948210/map-showing-the-african-american-population\" class=\"tumblr_blog\" target=\"_blank\">mapsontheweb</a>:</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Map showing the African American population distribution in the United States, 1900.<br/></p> <p><a href=\"http://mapsontheweb.zoom-maps.com/post/165048948210/map-showing-the-african-american-population\" class=\"tmblr-truncated-link read_more\" target=\"_blank\">Keep reading</a></p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>I was going to answer the obvious question &ldquo;what&rsquo;s up with Oklahoma&rdquo; by pointing out the Oklahoma Territory (W) and Indian Territory (E) wouldn&rsquo;t be combined into a state until 1907</p><p>But the Oklahoma Panhandle was added to the Territory in 1890, so why is only a third of it there? But then I noticed the PNW and the everything and it&rsquo;s just a sloppy map</p><p>Bonus history: the Oklahoma Panhandle is residue of the <a href=\"https://t.umblr.com/redirect?z=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FMissouri_Compromise&amp;t=NTQ5OTRiZTkzZDc1ODY1Nzk2NTdjZjVhMTMxYjljOGJlZTk4ZTYyMyxkNmJjZjVkYTc3Njk2YjY2ZmZlM2JmOGQzNjE5ODg1ZGU1ZmQzZjJi\" target=\"_blank\">Missouri Compromise</a>, Texas had to yield its claims north of 36\u00b030\u2032 in order to be a slave state</p>\n<img src=\"/media/tumblr_ovn4cer45o1rasnq9o1_1280_6213bee2b9f3.jpg\" />", "thumbnail_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/media/tumblr_ovn4cer45o1rasnq9o1_1280_6213bee2b9f3.jpg", "thumbnail_width": 1280, "thumbnail_height": 1344}