Draft 1 of “Open Problems in Rationality”
This is a draft (obviously).
Open Problems in Rationality
I’m not claiming that any of these problems are easy, unique to rationalists, or even solvable.
- Long term follow through. Given a person who wants to make a long term change (in their habits, lifestyle, etc.) how do you cause them to actually do it.
- How do we get depressed people care? (Maybe should just be “people with mental health issues?” Do anxious people find it much harder to create appointments?
- How do we detect completely broken personal epistemologies?
- Internalizing insight: Given a large amount of plausibly useful advice/wisdom/insights, how does one internalize it? How does one turn it into changes in behavior or thought patterns?
- Novel intervention effect: New interventions start out very successful, then rapidly regress to uselessness.
- Causing things to happen: if someone commits to doing a thing / causing it to happen, there is still an excellent chance that thing will not happen, even if doing it is relatively trivial.
- Predictions: how do we become more accurate forecasters?
you join with all the other overdetermined currents reinventing/reviving the (post-)Christian church and reinvent/revive the (post-)Christian church, probably