{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Opinion analysis: Justices hold ban on \u201cdisparaging\u201d trademarks violates Constitution", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/162036876868/", "html": "<a href=\"http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/06/opinion-analysis-justices-hold-ban-disparaging-trademarks-violates-constitution/\">Opinion analysis: Justices hold ban on \u201cdisparaging\u201d trademarks violates Constitution</a>\n<p>So in a unanimous 8-justice decision in Matal v. Tam, the US Supreme Court says that the US Patent Office may not constitutionally refuse to register \u201cderogatory\u201d or \u201cdisparaging\u201d trademarks (<a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_or_Controversy_Clause\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, the name of Portland-based dance-rock band The Slants)\n\n</p><blockquote>\nThey reasoned that the clause allows an applicant to register a \u201cpositive or benign\u201d trademark, but \u201cnot a derogatory one.\u201d Because it \u201creflects the Government\u2019s disapproval of a subset of messages it finds offensive,\u201d it \u201cis the essence of viewpoint discrimination.\u201d\n</blockquote>\nThe obvious immediate effect will be to end assaults on the trademarks of the Washington Redskins; further on tho the precedent might stop the DMV from refusing custom license plate \u201c<a href=\"http://sfgate.com/news/article/See-the-vanity-license-plates-rejected-by-the-DMV-6227385.php\" target=\"_blank\">DRGN BLS</a>\u201d"}