{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "is latinx basically just latin", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/159663051273/", "html": "

obiternihili:

\n\n

argumate:

\n\n

sigmaleph:

\n

argumate:

\n\n

is latinx basically just latin

\n\n

\u2018latino or latina\u2019

\n\n

do you call people from latin america latins, this is a serious question i need the answer to

\n
\n

is Latin America basically everything except USA, Canada, Belize, Suriname, and Guyana? because boy does that feel like an unnatural category.

\n\n

I\u2019m used to it being anything but the US, Canada, and the British Carribean; Belize, Suriname, Guyana, and France being lumped in there too.

\n\n

for a hot second the trend was “latin@”, which you could at least pronounce “latinat”

"}