\n"}I\u2019ve touched on this before but let\u2019s expand on it here. George R. R. Martin\u2019s A Song of Ice and Fire series is an epic tragedy in the classic sense, in which a succession of characters bid for the world before being brought low by their inherent personal shortcomings. What\u2019s particularly interesting in this is that the Starks of Winterfell embody tragic flaws that are typically presented in fantasy fiction as virtues, the very traits that both signal that the protagonists deserve to win and enable that very triumph. As such, they serve as a critique of the fantasy genre and, implicitly, the audience drawn to it who see in such protagonists an idealized vision of themselves.
\n\nNed Stark opens the series with a tableau engineered to position him as the Good Ruler, executing a man by his own hand, illustrating a firm will, capable hand, merciful heart, eyes open to the realities of power, and shoulders to bear the burden in service of others. He is Duty, Honor, Loyalty - to Robert, to the Old Gods, to (with his incessant focus on Winter) the realm as a whole rather than any factional interest. He could plausibly have contended for the Iron Throne after the overthrow of Mad King Aerys, but left the duty - and the corruptions of court life - to Robert and returned north to the \u201creal things\u201d of life.
\n\nHe\u2019s the noble, capable, masculine (but not macho) hero of so much fantasy, which of course is why he fails. He doesn\u2019t play the petty sycophantic influence-peddling games of court - so when Robert dies he has no true allies in court, no knowledge of the power dynamics at play, no ability to see the manipulation of false allies. Concerned with the formal lineage of succession - as if truth and propriety matters more than appearance and power - but insistent on working through proper channels and unwilling to act without formal legitimation, he gives his enemies all the delay, forewarning, and opportunity they need to outmaneuver him and he ends up executed by the henchman of the most Unworthy ruler.
\n\nSansa Stark is the feminine hero of romantic fantasy - like Ned, she\u2019s enchanted with nobility\u2019s self-mythology and given to mistake that for actual practice. She wants to marry a prince when she grows up, and orients the entirety of her selfhood to this end - acting proper and saying the right thing, above all striving to cause no offense. Like the heroine of so many romantic fantasy novels, she finds her prince. Like the plot of so many romantic fantasy novels he\u2019s a ruffian in need of reform who takes what he wants. Like the readers of so many romantic fantasy novels her dreamy passivity does nothing to reform him. Like the plot of so many of their lives she finds herself paired off with a succession of alternatingly abusive, ugly, and lecherous men.
\n\nArya Stark is I\u2019d say two things - first, she\u2019s the classic fantasy figure of the heir to the unjustly deposed Good Ruler, who has to go off on a quest, take on a mentor, make allies, et cetera et cetera, James Frazer. Except you realize she keeps doing this but given that the world doesn\u2019t stay still while she\u2019s off questing, she never accomplishes anything. She doesn\u2019t make it to Winterfell, she doesn\u2019t make it make it back to her mother, she keeps getting sidetracked and diverted. She finds mentors in Syrio and the Kindly Man, finds allies and travelling companions in Gendry and Hot Pie and Jacquen and the Hound, but none of it amounts to anything. She revenges some of her suffering but after years has 0 influence on the actual contest for the Iron Throne and has mostly just become an increasingly cold-blooded killer.
\n\nSecond, Arya is the Strong Female Character, that archetype popular in the girl-power \u201990s (and before) as superior to Sansa\u2019s \u201cweak\u201d femininity. She\u2019s not into sewing and delicacy, she \u2018s into sword fighting and dirt. But for all that, she ends up dragged around and at the mercy of men as much as Sansa - yes, in an idiom that allows her to consider herself as more of an agent, and with an ability to hurt people who hurt her. But it doesn\u2019t really keep her from getting hurt. (For a series with so much rape, especially in the early books of girls noted with an increasingly eyebrow-raising regularity as being exactly thirteen years old, the Stark girls sure do spend a lot of time at the mercy of abusive men without it quite going there, don\u2019t they.) And by the \u201cpresent day\u201d she\u2019s spending a lot of time hanging out with the demimonde in seedy bars down by the docks. Not that she\u2019s a prostitute, oh no. She\u2019s a rogue. Though she does take some pride in the fact that she blends in. Look, I did renn faires in middle school. Hell, I live in Portland. There\u2019s a certain kind of girl\u2026 look, I\u2019m not saying, I\u2019m just\u2026 wait, no, I am saying.
\n\nCatelyn Stark is the good mother, who wishes the boys would put down their swords and realize what\u2019s important is family, and the real force in this world lies with the generative potential of women. She\u2019s \u201970s-\u201980s feminist fantasy in the Marion Zimmer Bradley mold. She cares for her children, the girls as much as the boys - which is why she releases Jaimie in hopes of returning her daughters, thus forfeiting the Stark leverage against Lannister treachery. At the same time she respects her children\u2019s autonomy, unlike Cersei not just as means to the ends of power, failing to compel Robb to marry for dynastic advantage. Which is her undoing, dying with her beloved child at the hands of a man who treats his wives as disposable incubators. The female power of generative blood proving ultimately vulnerable to the male power of destructive steel.
\n\nRobb Stark is the charming young hero, a less seasoned Ned. Capable but burdened with a sense of honor, duty, and obligation, he could have saved a whole lot of trouble by maintaining a distinction between the loving woman you use for sex and the woman of social position you marry to start a family with.
\n\nBran Stark I think if anything is a standin for GRRM himself - he\u2019s incapable of doing anything directly, but as a skinchanger he can inhabit anyone, see through their eyes, act through their bodies, in a manner paralleling the series\u2019 regular cycling through POV characters. I\u2019m not really sure what Bran\u2019s arc \u201csays\u201d about that dynamic.
\n\nRickon Stark is like three, dude. And Jon Snow? Is not a Stark.
\n\nNow that we\u2019re here might as well touch on some other characters.
\n\nDaenerys is another critique of audience na\u00efvet\u00e9, thinking that oppressive hierarchy is a matter of bad morality rather than economic function. She frees slaves only to realize that oppressing the lower classes generates power and supports a fellowship of upper-class allies, while freeing and raising them up costs power and makes enemies. Also, even if she crosses the sea and conquers the Seven Kingdoms what of it? As an infertile woman, she can\u2019t found or restore a dynasty.
\n\nJaime is kind of a reverse of the Stark dynamic. They had virtues as flaws. Jaimie is defined by the vice of narcissism - his love for himself, which defines everything he does. Even his incestuous relationship with Cersei is an instance of self-love, beginning in childhood where, she says, if they switched clothes they were indistinguishable. But it\u2019s that very narcissism that leads him, on joining the Kingsguard, to reform himself from within, to go from Kingslayer to Goldenhand. And thus a character first defined by defenestrating a child while incestuously cuckolding the King might well prove the realm\u2019s noble salvation.
\n\nTyrion obviously, is the character most suited to rule the realm, his tragic flaw being the repeatedly wounded pride that keeps him from accepting that he can only rule on condition of receiving no respect for it. Had he waited out his father\u2019s plans he obviously would have found in Tommen a malleable figurehead.
\n\nCersei\u2019s flaw is her inability to distinguish between her person and her role. She thinks herself a master strategist because of her track record of success as a seductress; she thinks of herself as beloved because flattered by sycophants as regent. A Feast For Crows was hacked out. I\u2019m a writer, I know the signs. GRRM split one book into two when he really had 1.5 of material and to maintain the \u201c850 pages of setup, then main characters die and shit gets real\u201d structure he had to force the middle half, which took years. She overestimates herself but even she\u2019s too competent for the cabinet of toadies, the \u201cI\u2019m a good queen for not punishing my servants too bad for my getting fat\u201d bit. Cartoonish. What should\u2019ve happened was she intercepts a letter from one of the young nobles she thinks she\u2019s seducing as part of a power scheme and learns that he\u2019s been seeing the thing the other way around.
\n\nAnd that\u2019s what I think about that.
\n