{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "Why racists are at war with National Review over Donald Trump", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/128815822343/", "html": "<a href=\"http://www.vox.com/2015/9/8/9276719/nrorevolt-cuckservatives\">Why racists are at war with National Review over Donald Trump</a>\n<p>This is one of the best and most fairminded treatments of the subject I\u2019ve seen.</p><p>Of all the \u201cJuicebox Mafia\u201d first wave of big-name bloggers I thought Matt Yglesias was the best writer but recently I\u2019m almost thinking that was a bit of a handicap because it left him stuck as just a writer.</p><p>I think he FINALLY realized that the \u201csharing the consensus wisdom of 2002 Harvard with 2006 Internet\u201d shtick was played out as that stuff filtered into the general population (under his influence, among others), which was nice but going on to the density stuff seemed bizarre - drilling down on one \u201cwonk\u201d topic and writing a fucking *book* struck me as a career step <i>down</i> from where he was (though maybe understandable given influence from the familymembers who made their name as writers back when books were a thing).</p><p>(Also he had a kid and that might have slowed him some - it\u2019s always a shame and a waste when writers start treating their families as more important than their writing and their audience. The correct role model is Rousseau.)</p><p>And contrasted to, say, Ezra Klein working his way up the value ladder and building his empire at the Post and then Vox, it was a little underwhelming.</p><p>But for all that, looking at this you remember he\u2019s still got it, his voice is the house style of Vox, only he can actually do it <i>well</i>.</p>"}