{"version": "1.0", "type": "rich", "title": "They say \u201cyou can\u2019t take it with you\u201d. Of possessions, at death. Implicit suggestion being you should shift energy away from...", "author_name": "kontextmaschine", "author_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "provider_name": "kontextmaschine", "provider_url": "https://kontextmaschine.com", "url": "https://kontextmaschine.com/post/123169554873/", "html": "<p>They say \u201cyou can\u2019t take it with you\u201d. Of possessions, at death. Implicit suggestion being you should shift energy away from accumulating them towards accumulating\u2026 memories? happiness?</p><p>But if you can\u2019t take it with you, at least someone <i>else</i> can inherit and use it. Whereas your memories and happiness\u2026</p><p>That\u2019s part of why I don\u2019t fuck with the whole EA utilitarian thing. Hedonism is a consumer good. Considering how regularly you need to refresh your happiness, it\u2019s not even a consumer durable. Why the fuck would you maximize for that, at the expense of the charismatic capital goods - the standing waves of meaning that are culture and social technology - that can be generated through denying happiness, through <a href=\"/post/123079622033/\" target=\"_blank\">inflicting repressive force</a>?</p><p>The other part, and this is going to sound simple as hell but took a whole Ivy League grad seminar on political philosophy to get through to supergenius me, is this - let\u2019s accept, arguendo, that you\u2019ve got a morality that correctly distinguishes good from evil.</p><p>Why prefer good to evil?</p><p>The Christians have a reason - doing so wins the favor of the most powerful being in existence, that controls all earthly events and can bestow afterlives of eternal pleasure or eternal torment at whim.</p><p>That\u2019s the point of a god, to slap together out of pure storytelling charisma a kludge of an instrumental force to prop up your morality.</p><p>That\u2019s what Nietzsche was on about when he said that God is dead but it has not yet reached the ears of men - that too many athiests haven\u2019t followed things through to their conclusion.</p><p>A lot of attempts at humanistic philosophy try to build a Big Other out of humanity to serve the same purpose - because people will only like and help you if you\u2019re good and thus good is necessary to the conduct of human endeavors.</p><p>But it\u2019s the people who go around most strongly insisting on any particular vision of good and evil - social activists, imagine - who can most readily name the most instances of people creating, and attaining and maintaining control over human endeavors specifically by doing \u201cevil\u201d.</p>"}