\n\u201cSusicion of Authority\u201d is Also Propaganda - From Memexplex.com\u00a0 (via abstractminutiae)"}While individuals get our empathy and sympathy, institutions seldom do. The \u201cwe\u2019re in this together\u201d spirit of films from the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s later gave way to a reflex shared by left and right, that villainy is associated with organization. Even when they aren\u2019t portrayed as evil, bureaucrats are stupid and public officials short-sighted. Only the clever bravado of a solitary hero (or at most a small team) will make a difference in resolving the grand crisis at hand.
\n\nThis rule of contemporary storytelling is so nearly universal that it has escaped much comment \u2014 because you never notice propaganda that you already agree with. In other words, the reflex is self-reinforcing. A left-leaning director may portray villainous oligarchs or corporations while another film-maker rails against government cabals. But while screaming at each other over which direction Big Brother may be coming from, they never seem to notice their common heritage and instinct \u2014 Suspicion of Authority (SOA) \u2014 much in the way fish seldom comment on the existence of water.
\n\nIndeed, one of the great ironies is that we all suckled SOA from every film and comic book and novel that we loved\u2026 and yet, we tend to assume that we invented it. That only we and a few others share this deep-seated worry about authority. That our neighbors got their opinions from reflexive, sheeplike obedience to propaganda. But we attained ours through logical appraisal of the evidence.
\n\nNo, you did not invent Suspicion of Authority. You were raised by it.